News

Digital rights organizations ask for transparency in content removal on Facebook

More than 70 organizations from all around the world, with SHARE Foundation among them, signed an open letter to the Chief Executive Officer of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg  with a request of ensuring transparency and liability for the content removal process on this social network. The letter requests from Facebook to clearly and precisely reveal how much content it removes, with or without basis, as well as to enable its users to fairly and timely make complaints to removed content in order for the content to be back online as soon as possible in case of a mistake.

The letter asks for adoption of “Santa Clara principles” and points to the fact that many high-profile figures such as politicians, museums, or celebrities managed to bring their content back on Facebook thanks to all the media attention. For most ‘regular’ users, this is not the case, because Facebook allows complaints to content being removed only in certain circumstances. Beside the implementation of a more efficient mechanism for complaints, Facebook is also requested to publish reports on transparency and to include details such as the type of removed content, the initiation of moderation actions and the number of wrong moderation decisions regarding the content removal.

“We know that content moderation policies are being unevenly applied, and an enormous amount of content is being removed improperly each week. But we don’t have numbers or data that can tell us how big the problem is, what content is affected the most, and how appeals were dealt with. Mr. Zuckerberg should make transparency about these decisions, which affect millions of people around the world, a priority at Facebook,” said Nate Cardozo from  Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).

Related content

MUP and BIA illegally hacking phones of activists and journalists

Proven use of spyware and forensic tools contrary to law The use of spyware represents a serious attack on human rights, freedom of expression and privacy of citizens. In Serbia its use is becoming a common practice. A new report by Amnesty International indicates widespread use of spyware against activists, journalists and members of civil society by […]

From Imports to In-House: The Evolving Arsenal of Surveillance in Serbia

How NoviSpy marked a shift from foreign spyware to domestic tools – and what that means for citizens under watch By: Ivana Jovanović Mercenary spyware, specialized malicious software developed by private firms and marketed to governments as tools for fighting crime and terrorism, finds most of its customer base in law enforcement and intelligence agencies. […]

Spyware’s First Step: A Systematic Analysis of Exploits Used for Mobile Device Compromise

How forensic analysis uncovered manipulation, exploitation, and the hidden risks behind one of digital forensics’ most powerful tools By: Boris Babović A re-examination of data from the analysis of devices seized from Serbian activists — originally conducted last year by the international organization Amnesty International — reveals that the Cellebrite UFED forensic tool has the […]